Viral links are bad for your blog’s health

September 25th, 2007 | by Brook Durant |

Viral links are bad for your blog’s health

There, I’ve said it. Exactly what I’ve been thinking since I got involved with viral linking over a month ago. Earlier today I made the decision to remove myself entirely from the viral linking “chain letter” which is making its way around the blogosphere lately. Meaning I’ve decided not to actively promote it with other sites. If this blog still appears on different blogs viral lists I can’t do much about that. Why would I bow out of this link generation method? There are a few reasons that in and of themselves probably weren’t to much of a big deal, but taken as a whole I felt it best to get out. Ultimately I’m telling you all of this so that you might consider this viral linking from another perspective that you’ve not though about before.

Before I get into a great amount of detail as to why I’ll just run down the reasons real quick for those of you with short attention spans.

  • Quality of links
  • Maintenance of the list
  • Horrible click thru rate
  • I want to work on organic traffic
Quality of the links
I know nothing of SEO, but I do know that a great many of the links were coming from sources I didn’t care to be associated with. Not because they were bad, or morally corrupt but because there was no relationship beyond the link itself.

It’s said that in order to grow as a person we need to be around people who stretch us and force us to grow. That’s sort of the same principle I’m applying here. I’m going to work on individual relationships with those blogs and people I believe will not only help me to grow, but also benefit from being associated with me.

I also have a great concern over whether or not search engines might consider it to be a questionable practice. As I said before I’m considering “quitting” Google, but I’d really like for it to be on my own terms not because I did something for a few extra clicks a month.

Maintenance of the list
Simply put I was tired of keeping the list up to date. Removing those who hadn’t reciprocated my links, or adding those who had for the first time. Originally I had moved it to it’s own wordpress page and had been updating it every 3 or 4 days, but ultimately it became to much of a hassle.

Horrible click thru rate
I don’t believe the CTR justifies the work. I’m talking both incoming and outgoing traffic to and from viral links. For example up to today for the month of September I’ve gotten less than 35 clicks coming in to this blog. Outgoing clicks on viral listed sites has been less than 15. Compare that against Darren quoting me on Problogger which has gotten me 94 visits in the past month. As you can see the CTR for viral links is miserable.

In short the fact that I get more traffic from comments I make on other blogs than this blog being linked on a viral list speaks volumes to me. I’m willing to bet that if you did some research you’d probably find the same thing to be true on your blog as well.

I want to work on organic traffic
Above I mentioned that I am going to work on individual relationships. That’s part of what I mean by organic links. I’m throughly convinced that people are 100,000 times more likely to follow a link that is included as part of an actual meaningful post instead of simply lost amid a blob of other links. I simply don’t have the time or desire to sit here each week and create something truly original like dcr’s “Drunken Virals” posting. A viral link like that is surely more valuable than the ones most of us put up.

I’ve come to the realization that simply getting your name mentioned in a valid article is thousands of times more valuable than getting linked in a mass produced list hundreds of times.

There you have it. All of the reasons I am no longer participating in the viral link list. I am a little curious about if others have done the same thing as I have done…

  1. What reason did you have for quitting it?
  2. Has your trafffic increased or decreased since doing so?
  3. Is there any reason you believe I’ve overlooked that should give me pause about separating myself from this project?

Don't forget to subscribe to A Blog about Nothing's RSS feed!

11 Responses to “Viral links are bad for your blog’s health”

  1. MyAvatars 0.2

    By April on Sep 26, 2007

    I kept away from it because I didn’t want google to think it was link farming. Also I didn’t want links to come from adult sites etc.

  2. MyAvatars 0.2

    By RT Cunningham on Sep 26, 2007

    I did it for awhile and then I stopped. There really isn’t any benefit to it, except in the short term. Does it do any harm? Probably not. The problem is not really relevance but return on the investment of time. Is it worth the time? In my opinion, no. And that’s why I stopped doing it.

  3. MyAvatars 0.2

    By Website Design on Sep 26, 2007

    Hey, admirable move. I have a very strong appreciation for those not looking for shortcuts. Much respect.

  4. MyAvatars 0.2

    By A Blog about Nothing on Sep 26, 2007

    April - I never had problems with adult site links while I participated, but it might have been just plain dumb luck. I’m not really too concerned how Google views it. I use blog rush and there’s a chance Google will frown heavilyh upon that for those of us who use adsense. As I alluded too in my article about quitting Google I believe as webmasters/bloggers we spend way to much time worrying about Google. In fact Darren over at Problogger has a video blog up about how pointless it is too try to build your blog around Google. Essentially he says take of your blog with great content and Google will take care of itself.

    RT - That’s a great point. Investment of time vs return. I’m sure the first few times it happened it did quite well for people involved, but that idea like everything else has fallen prey to the “law of diminishing returns”

    Website Design - Thanks for stopping by and commenting! I never really considered it to be a shortcut while I was doing it. Especially because as RT pointed out the return for your time investment is anything but a shortcut.

  5. MyAvatars 0.2

    By Capri on Sep 27, 2007

    High 5 - any move away from any kind of chain letter thing can only be good as far as I’m concerned.

  6. MyAvatars 0.2

    By A Blog about Nothing on Sep 28, 2007

    Capri - Thanks and back at ya! I think they’re good for an initial infusion of traffic to get your name seen a few times, but not worth much more than that.

  7. MyAvatars 0.2

    By Mike on Oct 15, 2007

    I have only recently started blogging and saw Viral linking on a site that recommended it, so I decided to use it just to get a bit of traffic my way. I probably won’t use it again as I would rather get traffic through sites that I know and a bit of SEO.

    We all have to start somewhere :)

    Mike

  8. MyAvatars 0.2

    By John Hunter on Jan 14, 2008

    I agree in general. Viral links are in general lame. The one type I like at times are those that provide some additional information about those bloggers related to you (5 things you don’t know about me…). But they are so overdone that they are largely spoiled.

    John Hunter’s last blog post..Emerging-market Multinationals

  9. MyAvatars 0.2

    By A Blog about Nothing on Jan 14, 2008

    Hey John thanks for stopping by. Hope to see you again. That’s largely why I gave them up. Because no one put any effort into them. It just was a quick block of text. Only difference between them and the porn spam I get here is they link to blogs and the porn links to porn. Otherwise it all looks the same to me.

  10. MyAvatars 0.2

    By andar909(new comment) on Aug 10, 2008

    hi, andar here, i just read your post. i like very much. agree to you, sir.

  1. 1 Trackback(s)

  2. Feb 13, 2008: Disadvantages of Viral Linking | PureBlogging

Post a Comment

-->