<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>A Blog about Nothing &#187; News and Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ablogaboutnothing.com/category/news-and-politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ablogaboutnothing.com</link>
	<description>No really, it's about nothing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 18:33:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>It takes one to know one</title>
		<link>http://www.ablogaboutnothing.com/takes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ablogaboutnothing.com/takes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 03:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ABaN</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News and Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ablogaboutnothing.com/?p=510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A while back (8/07) I mentioned an incident in which a drunk moron jumped into a bear cage and was eaten. (Un)fortunately that person apparently wasn&#8217;t as stupid as I had thought&#8230; This woman is far more idiotic. She doesn&#8217;t even have the excuse of being drunk:

A polar bear attacked a woman at Berlin Zoo [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A while back (8/07) I mentioned an incident in which a <a href="http://www.ablogaboutnothing.com/only-an-idiot-would-jump-into-the-bear-cage/" target="_blank">drunk moron jumped into a bear cage</a> and was eaten. (Un)fortunately that person apparently wasn&#8217;t as stupid as I had thought&#8230; This woman is far more idiotic. She doesn&#8217;t even have the excuse of being drunk:</p>
<blockquote><p>
A polar bear attacked a woman at Berlin Zoo Friday afternoon after she climbed a fence and jumped into its habitat during feeding time, police said Saturday.<br />
The bear attacks the woman during feeding time at the zoo.</p>
<p>
The bear attacks the woman during feeding time at the zoo.</p>
<p>
One adult polar bit her several times after she plunged into the moat, police said.</p>
<p>
Zoo workers tossed rescue rings toward the woman to hoist her out and distract polar bears swimming nearby, said Goerg Gebhard, a Berlin police officer.</p>
<p>
&#8220;They saved her life,&#8221; Gebhard told CNN.</p>
<p>
The woman was severely injured and was being treated at a hospital, police said.</p>
<p>
It&#8217;s unclear why the woman entered the bear habitat, but police issued her a citation for trespassing. &#8211; <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/europe/04/11/polar.bear.attack/index.html" target="_blank">Source</a>
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ablogaboutnothing.com/takes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Idiots guide to financial relief</title>
		<link>http://www.ablogaboutnothing.com/idiots-guide-financial-relief/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ablogaboutnothing.com/idiots-guide-financial-relief/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 04:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ABaN</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News and Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ablogaboutnothing.com/?p=500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[G20 make pledge to restore growth
Thank God for the G20 pledging to restore growth! I mean I felt entirely lost without their decision to restore growth. 

But before we get too excited about the reemergence of our economies maybe we should consider this:

Led by Germany&#8217;s Peer Steinbruck, they are concerned about all the billions being [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><em>G20 make pledge to restore growth</em></center><br />
Thank God for <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7943794.stm" target="_blank">the G20 pledging to restore growth</a>! I mean I felt entirely lost without their decision to restore growth. </p>
<p>
But before we get too excited about the reemergence of our economies maybe we should consider this:</p>
<blockquote><p>
Led by Germany&#8217;s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer_Steinbr%C3%BCck" target="_blank">Peer Steinbruck</a>, they are concerned about all the billions being added to governments&#8217; debt, and have said it would be best to see if the current stimulus schemes start to work before more money is dedicated.
</p></blockquote>
<p><em>They</em> are some European finance ministers. <em>They</em> make sense. The UK and US financial types think pouring more money on the problem is the solution. They are <strong><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ID-Ten-T_Error" target="_Blank">ID10Ts</a></strong> of the highest magnitude. Period.<br />
<center><br />
<strong>Idiots</strong><br />
<img src="http://www.ablogaboutnothing.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/idiots.jpg" alt="3 idiots" title="3 idiots" width="500" height="375" class="alignright size-full wp-image-501" /><br />
</center></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ablogaboutnothing.com/idiots-guide-financial-relief/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No sherrif evictions in Chicago area</title>
		<link>http://www.ablogaboutnothing.com/man-heart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ablogaboutnothing.com/man-heart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 05:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ABaN</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortage crisis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ablogaboutnothing.com/?p=336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Crook county sheriff suspends evictions in Chicago area.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div style="float:right;"><script type="text/javascript">submit_url = 'http://www.ablogaboutnothing.com/man-heart/';</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://bloggingzoom.com/evb/button.php"></script></div><span style="float:left;padding-right:1.5%;"><img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v299/bsd13/blogstuff/fathers-pay-009.jpg" alt="Crook County Sheriff Thomas J. Dart"></span>In these troubled financial times it&#8217;s nice to see that someone out there has a moral compass that isn&#8217;t pointing straight to &#8220;greed&#8221; all the time. </p>
<div align="center">
<blockquote style="font-size:90%;background:lightyellow;text-align:justify;"><p>
 CHICAGO, Illinois (CNN)  &#8212; Sheriff Thomas J. Dart said Wednesday he is suspending foreclosure evictions in Cook County, which had been on track to reach a record number of evictions, many because of mortgage foreclosures.</p>
<p>
Sheriff Thomas J. Dart of Cook County, Illinois, says proper eviction procedures aren&#8217;t always been followed.</p>
<p>
He said many of the evictions involve renters who are paying their rent on time but are being thrown out because the landlord has fallen behind on mortgage payments.</p>
<p>
Mortgage companies are supposed to identify a building&#8217;s occupants before asking for an eviction, but sheriff&#8217;s deputies routinely find that the mortgage companies have not done so, he said.</p>
<p>
&#8220;These mortgage companies only see pieces of paper, not people, and don&#8217;t care who&#8217;s in the building,&#8221; Dart said. &#8220;They simply want their money and don&#8217;t care who gets hurt along the way. &#8211; <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/10/08/chicago.evictions/index.html" target="_blank" title="CNN - Illinois sheriff: No foreclosure evictions on my watch">Source</a>
</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>
Of course we can argue night and day about his motives, but from the sounds of it they aren&#8217;t half bad. Now the question is will anyone else follow his example?</p>
<p>
For those who care here&#8217;s the <a href="http://www.cookcountysheriff.org/press_page/press_evictionSuspension_10_08_08.html" target="_blank">official statement on the Crook County Sheriff&#8217;s website concerning this decision</a>.</p>
<p>
This will prove very popular with the people facing eviction but I fear the cronies in the mortgage companies will come gunning for this guy&#8217;s political head at the first opportunity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ablogaboutnothing.com/man-heart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google ordered to disclose viewing habits of Youtube users</title>
		<link>http://www.ablogaboutnothing.com/google-vs-viacom-youtube/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ablogaboutnothing.com/google-vs-viacom-youtube/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 16:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ABaN</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Potpourri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dcma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google. viacom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ablogaboutnothing.com/?p=329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google ordered to provide user details to viacom for its lawsuit against youtube.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div style="float:right;"><script type="text/javascript">submit_url = 'http://www.ablogaboutnothing.com/google-vs-viacom-youtube/';</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://bloggingzoom.com/evb/button.php"></script></div>A US Federal court has ruled that Google must hand over <a href="http://www.youtube.com" target="_blank" title="Link to Youtube">Youtube</a> usage logs to <a href="http://www.viacom.com/Pages/default.aspx" target="_blank" title="Link to Viacom">Viacom</a>. Those logs include the following information.</p>
<ul>
<li>Log in ID of users</li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_address" target="_blank" title="Link to explanation of IP addresses">IP addresses</a> of users computers</li>
<li>Details of the video clips uploaded and viewed</li>
</ul>
<p>Viacom is the parent company of <a href="http://www.paramount.com/" target="_blank" title="Link to Paramount Pictures">Paramount</a> pictures and <a href="http://www.mtv.com/" target="_blank" title="Link to MTV">MTV</a>. They accuse YouTube of &#8220;massive copyright infringement&#8221;. A few other international companies are looking to join in on the lawsuit as part of a possible class-action against Google. One such company is <a href="http://www.premierleague.com/page/Home/0,,12306,00.html" targte="_blank" title="Link to UK PLA">The UK&#8217;s Premier League association</a> which contends that Youtube has allowed the <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070504/155624.shtml" target="_blank" title="UK PLA original suit">viewing of football (soccer) match highlights</a>.</p>
<p>
Clearly the lawsuit isn&#8217;t something new as it has been in litigation for over a year now, but these developments are troubling to say the least. This order opens a wide path not to just go after Google as a company, but also individual users of the YouTube service. I wonder if a person views copyrighted material, knowing it is copyrighted have they violated the law as well as those who supply it?</p>
<p>
What are your thoughts on this? Do you feel <em>violated</em>? Does it concern you that by embedding copyrighted material on a website or blog via YouTube that could possibly be considered an issue of copyright infringement?</p>
<p>
Additional information:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2008/07/court-ruling-will-expose-viewing-habits-youtube-us" target="_blank" title="EFF Youtube vs Viacom">EFF thoughts on the matter</a></li>
<li>Google has been ordered to turn over all the REMOVED videos as well. Google had argued that Viacom should have to specify the individual videos, but the judge disagreed</li>
<li>Google responded by saying:<br />
<blockquote style="background:lightyellow"><p>
&#8220;We are pleased the court put some limits on discovery,&#8221; Google said in the statement, &#8220;including refusing to allow Viacom to access users&#8217; private videos and our search technology. We are disappointed the court granted Viacom&#8217;s overreaching demand for viewing history. We are asking Viacom to respect users&#8217; privacy and allow us to anonymize the logs before producing them under the court&#8217;s order.&#8221;
</p></blockquote>
</li>
</ul>
<p>
<center><br />
Note: There is a poll embedded within this post, please visit the site to participate in this post's poll.<br />
</center></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ablogaboutnothing.com/google-vs-viacom-youtube/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vigilante injustice is alive and &#8220;well&#8221; in these here United States</title>
		<link>http://www.ablogaboutnothing.com/ronnie-white-vigilante-justice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ablogaboutnothing.com/ronnie-white-vigilante-justice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 22:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ABaN</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[injustice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[murder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronnie White]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vigilante]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ablogaboutnothing.com/?p=328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[19 year old kid Ronnie White was brutally murdered in his hold cell by an "unknown person" carrying out some sick form of vigilante justice. White had never even met with a lawyer let alone had a day in court.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div style="float:right;"><script type="text/javascript">submit_url = 'http://www.ablogaboutnothing.com/ronnie-white-vigilante-justice/';</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://bloggingzoom.com/evb/button.php"></script></div>Are you ready to be pissed off? Good, because you came to the right place. Check this out&#8230;</p>
<blockquote style="font-size:14px;background:lightyellow"><p>
A prisoner killed in a Maryland county jail on Sunday was a victim of &#8220;vigilante justice,&#8221; Prince George&#8217;s County Chief Executive Jack Johnson said.</p>
<p>
Ronnie White, 19, was in custody in connection with the death of a police officer.</p>
<p>
Ronnie White, 19, died of strangulation and asphyxiation and had two broken bones in his neck, an autopsy showed.</p>
<p>
An attorney for White&#8217;s family said that because White was being held in solitary confinement at the Prince George&#8217;s County Correctional Center, a corrections officer would have had to let whoever killed the prisoner into his cell. <span style="font:size:12px;"<a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/07/01/custody.death/index.html" target="_blank" title="Link to cnn.com story about Ronnie White">Link to rest of the article</a></span>
</p></blockquote>
<p>
This is a man who hadn&#8217;t seen his day in court nor had a chance to address the charges against him and some assholes decided to take it upon themselves to execute a summary judgment on him. Hell, even the worst dictators in the world have a greater sense of right and wrong than this. But what can &#8220;we&#8221; do about it?</p>
<p>
To start with we can demand justice. Someone <strong>must</strong> hang for this. It is as simple as that. Probably multiple people if the truth were known. I don&#8217;t mean legally hang I mean literally hang. Like they did to people in the old days. You know, wild west style. Except they&#8217;ll get a fair trial before they hang.</p>
<p>
Or am I wrong?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ablogaboutnothing.com/ronnie-white-vigilante-justice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
